Top 8 Libertarian Podcasts

Join, Nick Meyer aka - The One Armed Madman - Nolan 5150, and/or Daniel Steele as we tackle the latest in news, business, energy, AI, transhumanism, and their impact on the future of human liberty. Plus, one on one interviews discussing business, economics, energy, technology, aliens, the paranormal, and science fiction with the One Armed Madman. Every episode digs into how these forces shape our world—with an unapologetic libertarian edge

Nick’s perspective is forged from real-world grit: years behind the bar in Southern California, Maui, and San Francisco taught him how successful businesses actually run, while his time as an electrical line worker—and the electrocution that cost him a hand—gave him a deep respect for teamwork, resilience, and the critical infrastructure that keeps modern society alive.

Nolan brings the precision and leadership of a Harley Davidson Master Tech and shop foreman. After years running and rescuing motorcycle shops, he knows what competence, accountability, and real-world problem-solving look like.

Dan is the founder and CEO of Listening Post, an AI-agent startup, and a veteran entrepreneur with 25+ years in tech. He’s helped build multiple companies generating more than $100M in annual revenue. From launching and selling a gaming company, to scaling SillyBandz into a national powerhouse, to co-founding Influential—the first AI-powered influencer intelligence platform acquired by Publicis for $500M—Dan brings hard-won experience in AI, product strategy, and startup growth. He’s a frequent speaker, advisor, and operator who’s seen every side of the tech world.

Inspired by Mac Dre’s legendary track Too Hard For The F***in Radio, we embrace the anti-censorship ethos, recalling a time when being shut out of the mainstream meant hustling tapes from the trunk of your Caddy. If the powers-that-be had their way, we’d be doing the same with podcasts—but until then, we’ll be right here, going hard in the paint, uncensored and unfiltered. Welcome to Too Hard For The Radio. Tell me something good!

Under Construction

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

A nonpartisan bald news junky talks to his fellow Americans from all political stripes, and dissects top stories and rants about their implications -- along with other personal, science, and tech discussions.

Tim Moen is a firefighter/paramedic who ran for Prime Minister as Leader of the Libertarian Party of Canada in 2015 popularizing the slogan, "I want gay married couples to be able to protect their marijuana plants with guns!" On this show he interviews and debates guests on a quest to figure out how to live free in an unfree world.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Our hosts, Rod and Scott, are both lifelong Christians and believers. One is a registered Libertarian, and one is a registered Republican. In their weekly podcast they discuss current events, politics, religion, and just life in general. You never know in what direction the conversation will go. However neither do they, but it's always fun and they go about all topics with humor and enthusiasm. Will this week's conversations be about Trump's trolling and antics, modern day Israel, haunted houses and exorcisms, Catholicism vs. Protestantism, the globalists wanting us to eat bugs, or socialist run grocery stores? You'll have to tune in to find out!

Variologies is where theology, philosophy, and politics come together in deep, engaging discussions. Hosted by Dan Calcagno, this podcast explores Christian thought with both intellectual depth and clear, accessible language. From biblical interpretation to cultural analysis, each episode challenges conventional perspectives and uncovers fresh insights rooted in faith and reason. Whether you're a committed Christian, a seeker, or a skeptic, you'll find thoughtful dialogue that invites you to think more deeply about what you believe and why.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Do we, Christians, support public policies that are incongruent with a biblical worldview? And if so, how would we know?

How should a biblical worldview inform our approach to Criminal Justice, Education, Immigration, Illegal Drugs, Taxes, and more from a public policy standpoint? We can all think critically about these subjects even if we are not experts in a specific area, but are we thinking biblically about them?

Or is it possible that, as believers with a biblical worldview, we still need to thoroughly consider our approach to these subjects in light of how Jesus handled the relevant situations of His day?

Should we not at least consider the possibility that our approach is influenced more by the world’s norms and ethics than by Jesus? Is it possible that what Jesus said then could still have a powerful impact on today’s politics in precisely the place where ethics meets public policy? I think so.
Consider what Jesus said to believers who were in a country occupied by a foreign superpower:

"Observe those who bring about harmonious relationships between opposing people; they assuredly are fortuned with the 'good life,' for they shall be called the sons and daughters of God."

The good life. You know, the kind of blessed life everybody desires to have.

Jesus says it is for the peacemakers.

Not the Machiavellian power colluders playing all the right angles, scheming for all the advantages, and securing whatever they can for themselves. No, not them.

And not the moral legalists, either, who are diligent about keeping themselves untarnished by the messiness of life. No, not them.

Nor the armed revolutionaries, confident in their just cause.

No, to Jesus, the good life, the blessed life, belongs to those who step into the messiness of life and attempt to bring about some harmony from the conflict.

Those folks, the risk takers, they’re living the ‘good life.’

Will they be successful in their attempts for peace? Perhaps.

That doesn’t diminish their flourishing because it is in the doing, not necessarily in the successful outcome.

Those in conflict may have reasons to want to keep the conflict alive. Consider the foreign military officer, the Roman commander, and the local revolutionary fighter, the Jewish Zealot. One or both of them may have seemingly rational reasons for not wanting peace.

Nevertheless, a peacemaker will try to bring these two opposing sides together in some harmonious relationship. This is no trivial matter.

Even if those two directly involved truly appreciate the peacemaker, many others within the broader sphere of political influence may not be so pleased.

Okay, so what’s the point?

Everyone has reasons to justify their strong positions of opposition against one another. Roman commander vs Jewish Zealot; Democrat vs. Republican. The list could go on and on and always will. Why?

Because divisiveness is easy.

“Staying out of it” is easy.

Apathy is easy.

But peacemaking is not.

It wasn’t then. It isn’t now.

But it does lead to the Good Life. Don’t we believers want as much of it as possible?
We must reconsider how our worldview shapes our approach to today's relevant, often contentious subjects, and how to engage those entrenched in political opposition, which sometimes includes ourselves.
#CultureQuestioning #KingdomBuilding #DiscipleMaking

Two men walking the path to follow Jesus, Self-Defense, trying to bring more men into understanding God's grace.